Tom Sweeney

It's a coming of age tale….

White paper looks at why Canuck tech firms are “disappearing”

Posted by sweens on November 6, 2009

By Ottawa Business Journal Staff
Wed, Oct 14, 2009 11:00 AM EST

Canada is wasting the productive lives of “many brilliant and courageous knowledge workers, and losing large sums of money doing it.”

At least, that’s the hypothesis of a white paper released Wednesday morning by Toronto-based Impact Group, which aims to answer the question of why Canadian technology firms are “disappearing.”

Using interviews with former CEOs and investors from 18 R&D performing companies no longer part of Canada’s business landscape, Impact says it discovered that 10 of the 18 firms became insolvent with the other eight disappearing through merger or sale. In five cases, those mergers or sales were profitable, it added.

The extinct firms, however, shared a number of characteristics, Impact said:

- A lack of commerce competence through poor customer engagement;

- Preoccupation with technology and idea-driven R&D “often resulted in a large R&D team with… an unsustainable burn rate”;

- Dysfunctional governance, including lack of shared goals between management and the company’s board of directors, and a lack of enterprise experience among investors.

“While Canada is second to none in technology, there is a significant lack of commerce skills among our technology entrepreneurs”, says Douglas Barber, founder and former CEO of Gennum Corp. and now a distinguished professor-in-residence at McMaster University, in a statement supplied by Impact Group.

“Companies often find themselves dependent on U.S. and other foreign nationals for executive talent especially for customer-facing experience and skills. If we are to succeed, the notion that technology coupled with sufficient venture capital will lead to success in the knowledge economy must be complemented by a deeper understanding of the human dimensions of enterprise and of the value exchange that is commerce.”

 

 Available at – http://www.ottawabusinessjournal.com/295648957466126.php

Posted in News | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

It’s tough being a recruiter…

Posted by sweens on October 30, 2009

I find it tough being a recruiter sometimes! I do not mean because the job is demanding or the stress is insurmountable; but rather that sometimes, it is easy to be torn between the needs of your company and the needs of your candidates. As a recruiter I feel a direct tie to my candidates and that essentially I am their agent. I take on the responsibility of marketing them in a way that best represents their own needs as well as protects the needs of my company.

I recently spoke to a candidate who is displeased in their contract. The rate was not overly generous and I think the work environment might have been a little mundane at times. When they called me to explain why they were leaving prematurely, I could not help but agree with them. Every reason they came up with was accurate from their point of view and I could not help but think that if I was in that position, I would be doing the same.

Is this a normal feeling for recruiters?

I certainly did not put my company in a vulnerable position and suggest that the candidate was misrepresented – because they were not. The candidate was given all the facts before they signed up but it just was not a win-win situation for everyone involved.

I also found myself in a situation where I was working off limited information about the project and the client. This has ultimately comes around and proven to be a problem. As I mentioned before, sometimes when a recruiter recruits a positions for a system integrator, all the facts just are not there.

Very frustrating! Anyone else in the same boat??

Posted in Recruitment | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

ResuWe

Posted by sweens on October 27, 2009

Has anyone heard of this service yet?  I was catching up on some blogs recently and discovered this service called Resuwe.  Their information page contains the following information:

We are experienced recruiters constantly reviewing resumes on a daily basis. We know what works from a company’s perspective and also see the most common mistakes firsthand. So often we are helping job seekers tweak the content and formatting of their resume to suit the requirements of employers.

Why Resuwe? We decided to launch ResuWe as a way to help job seekers quickly and easily optimize their resumes to improve their chances of successful employment. We also are excited to blend our expertise as recruiters to make a truly interactive resume optimization and job search site.

Many aspects of a resume and the job search process remain the same over time yet so many aspects change and evolve at a rapid rate. ResuWe is geared to preserve the traditional job search techniques like a clean well formatted resume, a custom cover letter, top interview tips, yet incorporate the most effective cutting edge tools including a web based resume, online profile, social media, and resume optimization.

So far the site seems to have some good content but I have yet to try their service.  They also have a blog titled Fight Unemployment which may be worth checking out.  I have included the link here and have added it to my blog roll as well.

Any feedback or comments anyone has would be appreciated….

Posted in Recruitment | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

$13 an Hour? 500 Sign Up, 1 Wins a Job

Posted by sweens on October 22, 2009

By Michael Luo
Published: October 21, 2009
BURNS HARBOR, Ind. — As soon as the job opening was posted on the afternoon of Friday, July 10, the deluge began.

C.R. Engliand, a nationwide trucking company, needed an administrative assistant for its bustling driver training school here. Responsibilities included data entry, assembling paperwork and making copies.

It was a bona-fide opening at a decent wage, making it the rarest of commodities here in northwest Indiana, where steel industry layoffs have helped drive unemployment to about 10 percent.

When Stacey Ross, C. R. England’s head of corporate recruiting, arrived at her desk at the company’s Salt Lake City headquarters the next Monday, she found about 300 applications in the company’s e-mail inbox. And the fax machine had spit out an inch-and-a-half thick stack of résumés before running out of paper. By the time she pulled the posting off Careerbuilder.com later in the day, she guessed nearly 500 people had applied for the $13-an-hour job. “It was just shocking,” she said. “I had never seen anything so big.”

Ms. Ross had only a limited amount of time to sort through the résumés. While C. R. England has not been immune to the downturn, it has added significantly to its stable of drivers and continued to hire office staff members to support them. Ms. Ross was also trying to fill more than two dozen other positions.

The 34-year-old recruiter decided the fairest approach was simply to start at the beginning, reviewing résumés in the order in which they came in. When she found a desirable candidate, she called to ask a few preliminary questions, before forwarding the name along to Chris Kelsey, the school’s director. When he had a big enough pool to evaluate, she would stop. Anyone she did not get to was simply out of luck.

She dropped significantly overqualified candidates right away, reasoning that they would leave when the economy improved. Among them was a former I.B.M. business analyst with 18 years experience; a former director of human resources; and someone with a master’s degree and 12 years at Deloitte & Touche, the accounting firm.

Over the course of four days, Ms. Ross forwarded 61 résumés to Mr. Kelsey, while rejecting 210 others. The remainder never even got a look. Many were, in fact, never uploaded to the company’s internal system because there were too many.

Just before the advertisement was removed, a standard one-page résumé arrived from Tiffany Block, 28, who lived in nearby Portage and had lost her job four months earlier as an accounts receivable manager at a building company when it closed its Indiana office.

Someone she knew had applied for the job and had said so on Facebook. Ms. Block went to the company’s Web site and filed an application online, which many others had not. By doing do, her application went directly into the company’s system. She was hardly optimistic, since she had not had an interview in months.

Ms. Ross, however, passed it on the next day to Mr. Kelsey.

Attendance at Mr. Kelsey’s school has surged during the recession. Mr. Kelsey, 33, had just promoted one of his three administrative assistants, who handle the paperwork needed for drivers to hit the road. He needed a replacement quickly.

The overwhelming response astonished him. He asked Cheree Seawood, one of his current assistants, to go through the résumés and help pick out several to interview. To make the task easier, he decided they should be even more rigorous in ruling out anyone who appeared even slightly overqualified. Mr. Kelsey, an ardent New England Patriots fan, compared his personnel strategy to the team’s everyman approach.

“We like to get the fair and middling talent that will work for the wages and groom them from within,” he said.

In other words, he said, he did not want the former bank branch manager Ms. Ross had sent, or the woman who had once owned a trucking company, or even the former legal secretary.

He also realized that in this climate he could afford to be extra picky and require trucking industry experience.

The company eventually settled on eight people to interview, inviting in the first two just five days after the job was posted.

In the past, Mr. Kelsey had mostly ad-libbed interviews, but this time he asked his company’s human resources department for help. They sent him a list of 13 questions, as well as an eight-page packet with 128 questions grouped under 50 “competencies.” He decided he would ask them all.

At the end of each hourlong interview, he and Ms. Seawood each jotted down a rating for each applicant and then compared them.

Invariably, the candidates’ job search travails came up. One woman who lost her job had started working as a waitress and confessed she had come directly from her job on the overnight shift.

But Mr. Kelsey resolved to keep his personal sympathies at bay. “If you start judging applicants on want or need, eventually that want, or need, will go away when they get the job and their financial situation stabilizes,” he said. “Then you’re left with whatever skills they have.”

Before Ms. Seawood called Ms. Block to schedule an interview, she had been getting increasingly depressed.

“I felt like, I’m 28 years old, and I don’t have a job,” she said. “What am I doing with myself?”

But Mr. Kelsey was immediately impressed when she came in on the second day of interviews. Dressed in a conservative business suit, Ms. Block patiently answered all of the 100-plus questions. Mr. Kelsey liked that she remained consistent in her answers and showed independence.

Afterward, Mr. Kelsey gave Ms. Block a 9; Ms. Seawood rated her at a point lower.

The next week, however, Ms. Seawood gravitated to a different candidate. The woman had just had nose surgery and came in wearing a protective mask. Besides her qualifications, the fact she had not tried to postpone impressed Ms. Seawood.

But when Mr. Kelsey invited the woman back, the interview was a disaster. She grew visibly irritated amid his battery of questions.

Mr. Kelsey immediately called Ms. Block to ask if she could come in for a second interview.

Was an hour from now too soon?

Momentarily panicked, Ms. Block quickly assented.

Mr. Kelsey marched through many of his questions again. Then, trying to gauge her ability to be assertive among truck drivers, he added a new hypothetical: if she were in the stands at a baseball game and a foul ball came her way, would she stand up to try to catch it, or wait in her seat and hope it fell her way?

The other finalist had said she would wait. But Ms. Block said immediately that she would jump up to grab it.

Mr. Kelsey decided he had found his hire.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/22/us/22hire.html?_r=1&hpw

Posted in News | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Not looking for a job? Great. Not hearing about jobs? Why not?

Posted by sweens on October 19, 2009

I am pretty confident that if there was one thing that I could get consensus on it would  be that everyone hates searching for jobs. (If you are currently looking for a job, glad you are on my site)

The frustration of resume writing, interview prepping insecurity or trouble of not having a job is not the best experience. So when you finally get a job, most likely, you don’t want to go back to that god-forsaken process of searching again.

 If you are not looking for a job, I think that’s great –-you’re the type of candidate that recruiters love to know. You either, love your job and don’t want to leave, or you do not mind your job and you do not want to look for something else. Mind you, what I do not understand is why some people do not want to even hear about job opportunities. You may say that you are open to it, but are you? When is the last time you were offered a job when you were not looking for one? When someone offered you a job, did you stop and take note? Do you know how much your position goes for in another organization? Are you putting yourself out there to be found? 

 Whether or not youare the happiest person at your job, you should never runaway from hearing about potential jobs.

Why?
• You should always, always, know how much you are worth. Even if you love your job, knowing what someone else would pay you gives you extra leverage at your current job
• You might think that you have the best job, but what if an even better job is around the corner?
• You will never have to go back to the grind of actively searching again – you can just transfer from one job to the next without searching
• You always know that you are valued somewhere else

You never know the better option until you at least open yourself up to it…

Posted in Recruitment | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Put yourself out there and be found!

Posted by sweens on October 15, 2009

I have taken it upon myself to do a lot of research on the recruitment industry and if there was one thing that popped up over and over again it was this message:  if you want the right job to come to you, put yourself out there!

 I am sure this sounds obvious to most of you. But when you really start to think of it, how “out there” are you?  Is your resume on Workopolis? Do you have a LinkedIn account? What about a Facebook account? Do you have a blog? A website? Is your name on published documents?

 I am not saying that you should join every social network or post your resume on every site but I am saying that you should think about your own presence online. The fact of the matter is, if you are a talented and skilled worker in the tech industry, you should definitely make yourself available to be found. The labour industry is facing some incredible challenges and companies are always looking for talented people. But, those opportunities won’t always come your way if you are hiding in your office cubicle.

 It should also be said that recruiters are always vying for that coveted passive candidate, which means we are desperately looking for that person that is not looking for us.  So, hate to break it to you, but if you are the kind of person that applies incessantly to job offers, you are not exactly putting yourself out there in a way that gets results. You are better off making a name for yourself on LinkedIn writing comments on blogs and even joining “Talent Pools” for specific industries (jobs that go to you). The point is, get your ideas, your achievements, your personality posted in areas that will be seen and opportunities might just come knocking on your door.

 You would be surprised how many candidates, both passive and active, have been turned on to new opportunities which were made possible by the powers of social networking, and the ability to be found.  So, there you have it: make yourself known, make yourself accessible and make yourself found.  What is the worst thing that could happen??

**Article inspired by Jane and Marta**

Posted in Recruitment | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

What’s Your LinkedIn Strategy?

Posted by sweens on October 14, 2009

Ask yourself: “What’s my LinkedIn strategy?” If nothing comes to mind, it could mean one of two things – either you lack a personal strategy for using LinkedIn or you’re not a LinkedIn user at all – worse yet, you’ve never even heard of it. Whichever category you might belong to, you need to get yourself out of it, join the masses, and create a brand for yourself online. Here’s why:

 Before I started my job here at Procom, not only was I absent from LinkedIn, but I was also an avid boycotter of all social networks, excluding Facebook. I didn’t like the idea of being “found” online, nor did I see the point of spending countless hours chatting virtually with friends that were really just a phone call away. As much as I wanted to believe that my “offline presence” strategy was benefiting me (by allowing me to be more productive with my time), it was actually doing me harm because as valuable personal and professional relationships were being formed online, I was being left behind to contemplate my “productivity gains”.

 After much deliberation, I decided to swallow my pride and join the millions of Facebook users and LinkedIn professionals, the latter network having provided me with countless career opportunities and valuable professional contacts from around the globe.  Just the other day, I was “InMail-ed” by a fellow Procom employee (whom I had never even met) for an interesting opportunity regarding my interest in hockey (details available to the public only through my LinkedIn profile). Thus my LinkedIn strategy is actually quite simple (as can be yours!):

  1. I have 100% Profile Completeness
  2. I am constantly connecting – be it with past colleagues; current friends; or contacts for future opportunities
  3. I include keywords in my profile that allow me to be “found” (ironically enough)

 Since having accepted social networking as a part of my life, I have not only recruited several individuals to join LinkedIn, but I myself have been “recruited” by others – something that my ‘real’ social network is unable to do for me – how can you compare your circle of personal contacts and friends with a rapidly expanding global network of 12million+ professionals? You can’t. Young or old, job-seeker or not, everyone out there needs to embrace social media and make themselves visible to the masses. And what better place to do it than the World Wide Web! Ignoring the power of social networking because the concept is overwhelming to you will leave you struggling to communicate in the very near future. Get out of your comfort zone and create a brand for yourself on the Web – don’t get stuck communicating the way people used to – start communicating the way people do today, for better opportunities tomorrow.

**Article inspired by Jane and Marta**

Posted in Recruitment | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

Nortel to auction carrier networks division without initial bid

Posted by sweens on September 22, 2009

By Ottawa Business Journal Staff

Tue, Sep 22, 2009 3:00 PM EST

Nortel Networks Corp. has decided to auction off its carrier networks business and, unlike its previous division sales, is doing it without a “stalking horse” bidder this time.

The ailing telecom firm said its principal operating subsidiary, Nortel Networks Ltd. and its U.S. subsidiary Nortel Networks Inc. are planning to sell by auction the assets of its carrier networks division associated with the development of next-generation packet core network components.

The assets consist of software to support the transfer of data over existing wireless networks and the next generation of wireless communications technology, and include relevant non-patent intellectual property, equipment and other related tangible assets, the company said.

The purchaser will likely also get a non-exclusive licence of relevant patent intellectual property, Nortel added in its release.

The announcement marks the third Nortel business to be sold off since the company filed for bankruptcy protection in early 2009. However, this auction process is slightly different from the previous deals as it does not include an initial “stalking horse” bidder with a firm offer.

Bids will be accepted for the carrier networks business until the deadline of Oct. 16, with the auction to take place two weeks later.

The federal government on Sept. 17 gave the green light to the $1.13-billion sale of Nortel’s wireless business to Ericsson, and the company is now awaiting the final approvals for the $900-million sale of its enterprise solutions division to auction winner Avaya, which was also the “stalking horse” bidder for the business.

http://www.ottawabusinessjournal.com/295481941870324.php

Posted in News | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

TRANSACTIONAL VS.STRATEGIC RECRUITING: PART 2

Posted by sweens on September 22, 2009

Further to my last blog post, I would like to continue the discussion on the difference between transactional and strategic recruiting, with focus this time on strategic recruiting.

Strategic recruiting is not a numbers game. It is as the terms suggests, strategic. In a strategic recruit the emphasis is on the overall fit of the candidate to the opportunity and non-technical factors are heavily weighted in the overall hiring decision. Where a candidate sees themselves in five years or whether or not they are comfortable leading a team are just as important in a strategic recruit then their technical abilities.

For example, you may have the most technical candidate in front of you, but their communication and leadership skills could be dreadful. This candidate would not be a good fit for a senior developer role where they are going to be required to lead and mentor junior developers. Hiring this candidate is simply setting the candidate up for failure.

I would suggest that when an account manager is ‘taking’ this order from their client, they need to get a lot more detail in terms of what the hiring manager is actually looking for then they would for a position that would be considered a transactional recruit. This step is often a problem between recruiters and account managers and can lead to missed opportunities. Recruiters need to know the soft details for strategic recruits in order to find that true fit candidate.   Knowing these soft details can usually allow a recruiter to screen their candidates in to the opportunity during an interview, rather then having to screen them out.

It usually takes more time to present on a strategic recruit then it does on a transactional recruit as well. This is for many reasons but I would mainly argue that the emphasis is on finding the right candidate and it can take a bit longer to narrow your field down in order to find that one true candidate. I have also found through personal experience that the best candidates for strategic recruits usually come from candidates who are presently working. This means that finding them is done without the use of traditional job boards with a focus on referrals or non-traditional search platforms like LinkedIn. Using these tools usually takes a bit more time to deal with your candidates as they likely are not in a full-out job search.

All in all, both strategic and transactional recruiting can be effective strategies of recruitment. Firms either specialize in both or one over the other. The challenges with both are some clients may want a transactional approach to their open positions where as the recruitment cycle is that of a strategic one (or vice versa). As I said last time, transactional or strategic recruiting can be a product of the location or client base where the office is located and firms who have recruiters in one city recruiting positions in another city should take this into consideration when they look at their recruiting cycles.

Posted in Recruitment | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

TRANSACTIONAL VS.STRATEGIC RECRUITING: PART 1

Posted by sweens on September 18, 2009

From the time I have spent in the recruiting industry, I have found there to be two styles of recruiting: Transactional; and Strategic.  I would argue that there is a big difference between the two and some recruiters are a custom to one style over the other.  Let us focus on transactional recruiting.

 Transactional recruiting is a numbers game.  In a nutshell, a company gets a position to recruit and the recruiter(s) throws as many ‘bodies’ as possible at this open position in the shortest time possible.  The emphasis is on quantity over quality and ultimately the hiring decision is made by the clients’ hiring manager with little to no recommendation from the recruiter(s).

 In transactional recruiting, there is very little time spent on behavioural based interview questions, and more time spent on technical questions such as: have you worked with the following technologies; have you lead a team of developers before; etc.  Typically the recruiter tries to match as many people to his/her requirements as quickly as possible and tries to screen candidates in, rather then screening candidates out.

 This type of recruiting is usually done for a low profit margin (less then ten percent) and is fuelled by systems integrators.  Account managers usually know little information in terms of the overall project or needs of the client, and strictly work off an order sheet with a list of technologies and vague deliverables.

 I would suggest that transactional recruiting takes less skill then strategic recruiting (no offence meant to anyone) as most of the skills required for a transactional recruit involve key word searches and the ability to phone candidates as quickly as possible.  I would also suggest that transactional and strategic recruiting can be influenced by the industry, the clients and the location of your work.

 I recruit positions in Ottawa for the Federal Government.  This means that I usually get to submit one candidate for one job and do not have the luxury or option of submitting multiple candidates that kind of meet the job description fort my clients.  I need to find ‘the’ candidate for the job and I need to do it quickly.  Therefore, I would suggest that my focus and expertise is on strategic recruiting and this is the value I bring to my organization and my clients.

 A recruiting firm who specializes in transactional recruiting can be seen as an extension of their clients’ human resources department.  They screen and highlight candidate skills and then pass many bodies off to a hiring manager to make a final decision.  As a recruiter I would classify myself as a subject matter expert with exceptional skills in sourcing, screening and interviewing candidates.  If I do not get to practice these skills on my recruits, I feel as though I have become a transactional recruiter and are not providing my clients with the services they are paying for.

 Simply the thoughts of one strategic recruiter….

Posted in Recruitment | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Spanish court says hurling zinger of an obscenity at boss is no grounds for dismissal

Posted by sweens on September 18, 2009

By Daniel Woolls, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

MADRID, Spain – A court in Barcelona says insulting your boss with one particularly foul obscenity is not grounds for dismissal, insisting the slight is common in arguments in Spain and not that big a deal.

The zinger in question translates as “son of a b-,” and was used by a worker against his boss during a January 2008 money dispute in the northeastern city of Gerona. The worker, who also called his boss “crazy,” was promptly fired.

The man lost a first court challenge, but won on appeal with the Superior Court of Justice of Catalonia in February.

The ruling – first reported this week by Spanish human resources Web site Carta de Personal – said the worker should either be reinstated in his job or receive C6,483 ($9,472) in compensation. It is not known which option the employer picked.

“Without a doubt, both expressions are insulting,” Judge Sara Maria Pose Vidal said in the ruling, a copy of which was obtained by the AP. But she noted that when the man called his boss crazy, he had been on his way out of the office and the boss did not hear it.

She also wrote that the “son of a b-” remark should be viewed in linguistic context.

“The social degradation of language has caused the expressions used by the plaintiff to become commonly used in certain settings, especially in arguments,” Pose Vidal wrote, calling his dismissal a disproportionate punishment.

The court-provided copy of the seven-page verdict had the names of the employee and company blotted out – a common practice in Spanish court dealings with the media.

http://ca.lifestyle.yahoo.com/family-relationships/articles/archive/cp/home_family-spanish_court_says_hurling_zinger_of_an_obscenity_at_boss_is_no_grounds_for_dismissal

Posted in News | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Looking at recruiting trends for 2009

Posted by sweens on September 17, 2009

Founds this interesting article…

by Benjamin Yoskovitz – http://standoutjobs.com/site/blog/recruiting-trends-for-2009/

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Michael Specht lists 10 Recruitings Trends for 2009, including:

  1. quality of hire
  2. time to hire
  3. ROI, ROI, ROI
  4. use your talent pool
  5. look for innovative and cost effective advertising
  6. branding
  7. referrals
  8. social media
  9. social networking
  10. learn to use search engines to find candidates

John Sumser had a Recruiting Trends list (published in the Fall) with similar items, although there was some variation. I added my own thoughts to the mix when John published his trends list, referencing how the recruiting trends are relevant to Standout Jobs and our future plans.

When we look at Kevin Wheeler’s thoughts on what would be hot in 2008, we see quite a few similarities.

Looking at the combined lists, here are some additional ideas / expectations for 2009:

  1. Strategic Recruiting becomes a priority. Transactional, shotgun recruiting has been diminishing in value for some time. A recent report indicates that Monster’s revenue will drop 37% in the coming year as companies abandon or lower their job posting contracts. Companies need to look at recruiting strategically and what that means for budgets, time to hire, etc. In my mind, this is a meta-trend for some of the items Michael and John have listed.
  2. Consolidation. The job market is incredibly fragmented, which makes sense given the size of the market and the problems that have existed in it for so many years. I expect 2009 will see more consolidation, although the economic downturn can make it harder for big companies to acquire smaller ones. Nevertheless, I see this trend expanding in 2009 and certainly beyond, when things pick up further.
  3. HR converts into a Marketing Department. Maybe this is just a pipe dream, but the writing would appear to be on the wall. Again, I see this as a meta-trend – encompassing at least half of the recruiting trends Michael references, and at least an equal number of the recruiting trends in John Sumser’s list. Human Resources departments are shifting, and that shift will accelerate in 2009.

It takes time to make monumental change.

That’s certainly true in Human Resources, where many of the points listed above have been on people’s minds for many, many years. But things are changing. More and more recruiters are using Twitter. HR people (corporate and 3rd party recruiters) are blogging. Social networks like RecruitingBlogs are growing in popularity.

Things are changing.

2009 will be a very interesting year. Budgets are being cut (or frozen), people are nervous (or downright panicked), and as much as you can look for opportunity in tough times, driving change and innovation through tough times is extremely hard. It’s easy for people to fall back on what they’ve always done. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard, “You can’t be fired for posting on a big job board…”

Well … give it some time …

Posted in Recruitment | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Nortel customers support US$915M Avaya purchase of enterprise solutions unit

Posted by sweens on September 15, 2009

By Ottawa Business Journal Staff

Mon, Sep 14, 2009 12:00 PM EST

A group representing more than 4,000 Nortel customers has praised the selection of Avaya as the winning bidder in Friday’s auction for Nortel’s enterprise solutions business, a deal which makes Avaya Inc. the top provider of unified communications services.

The International Nortel Networks Users Association expressed its support for the US$900-million cash acquisition, which will transfer to Avaya all assets of Nortel’s global enterprise solutions business, as well as the shares of Nortel Government Solutions Inc. and DiamondWare Ltd.

“We are excited to begin working with Avaya, and are ready to turn the focus back on providing our members the great education, user-driven perspectives, and other services they have come to depend on,” said the association’s executive director Victor Bohnert in a statement. “Both Nortel and Avaya have been at the forefront of delivering high-quality, innovative products to the market. With their strengths now combined, we believe the customers of both companies will be the true winners of this deal.”

As part of the deal, Avaya has also agreed to put up $15 million for an employee retention program, following an announcement that it will be hiring 2,500 former Nortel staff worldwide, with roughly 800 of those in Canada and 680 in Ottawa alone.

“This is fantastic news for our customers, as this will empower us to continue to deliver industry-leading solutions and services focused on unlocking the enterprise business potential enabled by unified communications,” said Joel Hackney, president of Nortel’s enterprise business, in a statement.

Avaya’s final bid was almost double its initial “stalking-horse” offer of $475 million, as two other unidentified rivals also entered the fray.

The company must now wait for Canadian and U.S. court approvals of the proposed sale agreement at a joint hearing on Sept. 15, with the sale expected to close late in the fourth quarter of 2009.

The transaction is facing some opposition from competitors and former Nortel partners, including Verizon Communications Inc., which has filed a suit arguing that Avaya’s purchase could leave Verizon customers in the law enforcement, anti-terrorism and national security sectors without communications network support, since Avaya is allegedly refusing to take on Verizon’s support contracts with Nortel.

Earlier media reports also said a group of telecom industry companies has complained to the U.S. Department of Justice that an Avaya-Nortel union would create an unfair “duopoly” controlling nearly 80 per cent of the enterprise market.

Available at – http://www.ottawabusinessjournal.com/295419582173540.php

Posted in News | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »